thanks Phil. this approach sounds good. Vijay
Phil Roberts wrote: > > Folks, > > this discussion doesn't seem to be going anywhere at the point. Perhaps > we > can drop it? > > The decision of MUST/SHOULD is up to the working group to recommend in > its > spec, and Jari will reflect that decision when he produces the final spec. > The consensus that has been recorded so far is MUST for HAO processing, MUST > for > BE processing, SHOULD for RO support (although it's not listed in the > node/host/ > routers requirements section, 9.1 says it SHOULD be supported by all nodes). > We'll > look at the recent thread before determing whether the earlier consensus of > MUST for > HAO and BE processing are still intact. > > When MIP sends the spec up to the IESG for approval, we'll let the NG > working > group know the summary of the requirements that the MIP working group has > recommended. > > Phil > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 3:29 PM > > To: Vijay Devarapalli > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [mobile-ip] Re: HAO and BE processing will be mandated > > > > > > >but I keep hearing from the KAME folks again and again > > >"we already have IPv6 implementations which do not understand > > >HAO, we dont want HAO mandated" (which makes no sense to me). > > > > MUST for HAO is self-contradictory at best. if HAO is > > a MUST, we don't > > need bidir-tunnel (since it won't be used). if we have > > bidir-tunnel, > > HAO is okay with SHOULD. > > > > i don't want a pie-throwing match, but it seems that > > you want it... > > i keep hearing from you "we can ignore currently-deployed IPv6 > > codebase" which is total nonsense (or total ignorance > > of the current > > situation) to me. IPv6 is not a toy in your lab any > > more. we have > > people depend on it, we have serious IPv6 commercial > > network operation. > > > > i suggest to leave the SHOULD/MUST decision to jari, > > the main editor. > > > > itojun > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
