> My original preference was to keep them separate, but there > was a lot of > push back on the mailing list. Based on the mailing list > discussion, we > combined them. I agree that despite the work to combine them, it is > confusing to have mandatory & optional mixed. > > My recommendation is to publish them separately. This will > require some > small changes in the default router selection document > (keeping the load > sharing, but changing the mandatory/optional text).
I don't quite understand. Are you saying keep the load-sharing section in the router-selection draft, but make it optional, and then a second document makes load sharing mandatory?? Rich -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
