Hi,
On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Margaret Wasserman wrote in "Re: Thoughts on draft-savola-ipv6-127-prefixlen-04.txt": > In the Yokohama meeting, Steve Deering lead a > discussion on the uniqueness of IIDs, and there > was a pretty big majority of people in the room > who thought that we shouldn't even require IIDs > to be unique on a link. Addresses need to be > unique (obviously), but not necessarily the > IIDs from which they are created. The discussion > will be documented in the minutes, and we'll offer > a chance for people on the list to comment before > we make any final decision, of course. I went through the minutes and presentation of Yokohama meeting about "DAD vs. DIID Discussion". Maybe I am missing something here, but, if the Interface Identifier is not unique anymore on a link, what is it then supposed to identify and be used for ? Also, how would then the Link Local address be formed ? Thanks for any clarification there, Robert -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
