I recall many of us having concerns to review it. You included. /jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Elz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 10:52 AM > To: Bound, Jim > Cc: Margaret Wasserman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: DAD vs. DIID > > > Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 22:37:59 -0400 > From: "Bound, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > qcorp.net> > > | We had no such consensus. > > Yes, in the room, there was very clear support for this. Margaret > was correct. > > | In fact it was stated we had to take this to the mail list. > > Of course it was - all WG decisions get made on the list, so > everything > "decided" in the room has to be taken to the list. > > That is what is happening now... > > kre > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
