Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 18:26:45 +0300
From: Markku Savela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| As a consequence, and observing that others may not have chosen this
| tactics, the code also defends plain ID, that is: if it sees a DAD for
| address which contains one of my ID's, it will reply to the DAD as if
| I had the address. I don't see any catastrophic failures resulting
| from it.
Yes, that way should work.
But can you test what happens if you configure an address on some other
node (using a different implementation), that happens to be one that yor
node will assign, without doing DAD on it explicitly, and then start
your node after that.
That's the case where there's a potential for trouble with mixed
implementations I believe.
kre
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
