Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:05:30 -0400
From: Thomas Narten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[quoting Brian]
| > It's a matter of interpretation (you could ask the same question
| > about some ways of using the flow label for diffserv
| > classification).
Actually, my take would be that what the text is attempting to restrict
is the forming of state - not using the flow label. So, using (a hash of)
the flow label for choosing among alternate equivalent routes would be
just fine - as no state is being left behind when that's done. The issue
is creating some kind of state (memory if you like) when there's no defined
way to delete it.
| It would be far better if different readers didn't have to think too
| hard about this.
True.
kre
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------