Date:        Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:05:30 -0400
    From:        Thomas Narten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    Message-ID:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[quoting Brian]
  | > It's a matter of interpretation (you could ask the same question
  | > about some ways of using the flow label for diffserv
  | > classification).

Actually, my take would be that what the text is attempting to restrict
is the forming of state - not using the flow label.   So, using (a hash of)
the flow label for choosing among alternate equivalent routes would be
just fine - as no state is being left behind when that's done.   The issue
is creating some kind of state (memory if you like) when there's no defined
way to delete it.

  | It would be far better if different readers didn't have to think too
  | hard about this.

True.

kre

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to