I agree 100%. This did not have consenus on some key parts. /jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 3:08 PM > To: The IESG > Cc: RFC Editor; Internet Architecture Board; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Protocol Action: Default Address Selection for IPv6 to > Proposed Standard > > > wow. Having the document be approved by IESG is not a surprise, but > at the same time - the announcement is extremely misleading. > > Serious problems with the entire idea of address selection > were repeatedly > raised in WG discussions. At the very least this should have > been reflected > in the document announcement. > > Keith > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
