>> >o Move any document that suggests the use of IPv4 mapped address on wire
>> > to historic, due to security reasons.
>> Which documents would this include? SIIT?
>Only non-algorithmic portions of SIIT. (Or else NAT-PT should have to be
>rewritten to be independent).
>> Any others?
>The -00 nat64-nat46 draft.
draft-ietf-ppvpn-bgp-ipv6-vpn-02.txt
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
