>>>>> On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:03:53 +0900,
>>>>> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Additionally, I suspect the removal actually breaks user code so much.
> As I said before, user applications are usually expected to use
> library functions for source routing and to not use the ip6r0_addr
> member directly. In fact, we, the KAME project, do not use the member
> name in about 80 IPv6 applications we provide. I also searched on
> recent source code of FreeBSD and NetBSD (which have not supported
> 2292bis yet). The only occurrence of ip6r0_addr other than in user
^^^^^^^^^^"other
than" should be removed. sorry for the confusing wording.
> applications is in tcpdump, where no compatibility issue exists since
> tcpdump uses its own header definitions.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
