Hi Robert,
>(I don't know, obviously, but it is possible that the chairs then >believed that they couldn't change the doc, because attempting to specify >something that an IESG member doesn't like, or not to specify something >that they do like, can cause a doc to get held at "discuss" in the IESG >forever...) This is not the case, at all... >Even one of the WG chairs, in the message that started this discussion >(in its most recent go around anyway) said, on the list, on Aug 4 ... Yes. I expressed a personal technical opinion (which I still hold). But, there was not sufficient support for my opinion on the WG mailing list to constitute a consensus to make a change to the document. I accepted that fact, and the change was not made. Margaret -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
