Ah yes, sorry, I mistakeningly thought that we were discussing the scoped addressing architecture draft in the second thread. I probably shouldn't post at 3 AM.
--Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 04:58 > To: Brian Zill > Cc: Robert Elz; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: IPv6 subnet-local addresses and > draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-10.txt > > > > Hi Brian, > > Just to clarify... > > The subnet-local multicast scope is defined in the Addressing > Architecture document, which been sent to the IESG for > consideration as a draft standard. > > Perhaps the mention of scoping has you thinking of the scoped > addressing architecture? That hasn't been sent to the IESG > at all yet. > > Margaret > > At 06:14 AM 10/3/02, Brian Zill wrote: > > > From: Robert Elz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > I also assume that the necessary two implementations of > all of this, > > > that will allow a doc containing it to advance to DS have been > > > documented in the implementation report? > > > >This draft is up for PS, not DS. > > > >--Brian > > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > >IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > >IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > >FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > >Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
