> - CMSG_SPACE > - return type could be socklen_t to match msg_controllen > - argument type could also be socklen_t > > - CMSG_LEN > - return type could be socklen_t to match cmsg_len type > - argument type could also be socklen_t > >Short of a changing all of these to socklen_t, we should at least >consider changing the occurances of the size_t type to either >socklen_t or int or unsigned int. This would avoid the complications >raised by size_t on systems having to support both ILP32 and LP64 models.
Given that CMSG_SPACE and CMSG_LEN were defined in RFC 2292, and that their definitions have not changed in 2292bis, and that they do not used size_t, I'd vote for leaving them as is. - Jack -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
