> For v4, I agree with Bill *if* the multiple addresses belong to
> different subnets.
> 
> For v6, this is blurry. Would you call multihomed a host that has both a
> link-local and a regular unicast address on the same interface? I don't
> think so.

>From the point of view of what applications need to do, it's safest to
assume that all V6 hosts are multiaddressed.

                                                - Bill

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to