True, but the term 'hand-off' implies a make-before-break process, else
the MN is just establishing itself on a new link. Given it has the
opportunity to be aware of multiple links, it can decide when to switch.
I am arguing that it complete DAD 'before' it makes that decision, not
after.

Tony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pekka Savola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Tony Hain
> Cc: 'Nick 'Sharkey' Moore'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Optimistic DAD draft ...
> 
> 
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Tony Hain wrote:
> > [...] it would seem the prudent thing for a MN to do is 
> establish DAD 
> > for all candidate prefixes well before it is ready to start using 
> > them. [...]
> 
> Isn't there a problem with how this could be done, as 
> currently specified?
> 
> One can't perform DAD before being on the link.
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick 
> > > 'Sharkey' Moore
> > > Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 7:58 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Optimistic DAD draft ...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > G'day IPng-ers,
> > > 
> > >   One of the big issues in getting low-latency
> > > handovers working for IPv6 mobility is the long delay involved in 
> > > completing DAD.
> > > 
> > > One option is to allow the Mobile Node to communicate
> > > while the address is still Tentative (optimistically assuming
> > > that DAD will succeed), but to adjust its ND / SAA behaviour 
> > > in order to minimize disruption in case of an address 
> > > conflict (and maintain correct interoperation with 
> unmodified nodes).
> > > 
> > >   We've kicked the idea around a little on mobile-ip,
> > > and I've formalized my thoughts into an internet draft, 
> which should 
> > > get published soon.  In the meantime, you can find it at 
> > > <http://www.ctie.monash.edu.au/ipv6/fastho.htm>
> > > (tentatively titled draft-moore-ipv6-optimistic-dad-00).
> > > 
> > >         I'd be interested in your opinions on the draft, and its 
> > > potential suitability for standards track.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > cheers,
> > >         Nick
> > > -- 
> > > Nick 'Sharkey' Moore                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Research Fellow, CTIE                   Tel: +61 3 9905 3707
> > > Monash University,  Australia           Fax: +61 3 9905 5358  
> > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> > > IPng Home Page:                      
> http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> > > FTP archive:               
>        ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> > > Direct all administrative requests to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> > IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> > FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
> Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
> Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords
> 


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to