On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Kai Steuernagel wrote: > I just like to ask if it would make sense to reserve an address (prefix) out > of EACH 1/8th identified block even if today unassigned (as in RFC2373). - > This could be unified in prefix length and value e.g. (thanks to Michael: > 3FF8::/14; 5FF8::/14; 7FF8::/14; 9FF8::/14; BFF8::/14; DFF8::/14). No > matter what the other unnasigned blocks will be - it could be easier to > define it as of today. Just a thought.
No, this doesn't make any sense at all, IMO. Those other 1/8th's are supposed to be _unassigned_ for now. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
