Hi Brian, Rich & Keith, Maybe the best way forward would be to work on a BCP on Site Local addresses. This could point out what site-locals are good for, what they are not good for and some recommendations on using them.
John > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Brian Haberman [mailto:bkhabs@;nc.rr.com] > Sent: 24 October, 2002 23:21 > To: Richard Draves > Cc: Keith Moore; Margaret Wasserman; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Node Requirements Issue 3 > > > Rich, > Just for my edification: > > 1. Who else has site-local support? > > 2. Can you describe the operational deployments? > > 3. What applications? > > Thanks, > Brian > > Richard Draves wrote: > > This is craziness. We (I don't mean just MS) have shipping > > implementations that support site-locals. We have operational > > deployments using site-locals. We have applications that > work just fine > > with site-locals. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
