Hi Rob, One question
From : Rob Austein [mailto:sra+ipng@;hactrn.net] > > My main objection was and remains that this mechanism, if > used, moves > > state away from the endpoints and into the network in a way that > > cripples the resolver's ability to keep track of which of the name > > servers it is using are performing properly, since the > binding between > > any particular well-known-address and the name server > behind it might > > change at any time and since there is no mechanism by which the > > resolver can find out that such a change has taken place. > > => Are you assuming that more than one server will be configured with the same well-known site-local address? Because I don't think this is necessary, now that we have 3 different addresses. The binding betweem the well-known address and the name server need not change. Hesham -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
