On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 12:02, Keith Moore wrote:
> we'd be far better off to deprecate site local addresses, as nobody has
> actually given a convincing case for their use.
Site locals as defined in draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-10.txt are
functionally no different than RFC 1918 addresses for IPv4.
Long term, less chaos will result if a block of addresses is set aside
as "unregulated spectrum" than if folks start configuring prefixes out
of the ~73% of the address space that is currently unassigned.
Regards,
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Steven L. Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ericsson IP Infrastructure +1 919-472-9913
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
