I don't know if we want to say that IPv6 nodes SHOULD implement IPv4... However, I do think it makes sense to have a section that includes additional requirements (if any) for dual-stack nodes.
Margaret At 07:25 AM 10/27/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, 9) Are Transition mechanisms mandatory; is support for IPv4 mandatory? I think that IPv4 is not mandatory, but a strong SHOULD. If IPv4 is supported, then some sort of transition mechanism is madatory - anyone have suggestions on what should be mandatory? Text suggestions are helpful. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
