> > > DNS should not be a MUST. not all applications need to use it. > > Also, DNS is a separate service from IP. IP should not be > > thought to be dependent on DNS. > > I tend to agree with you. I see the following options: > > 1) For IPv6 nodes, DNS is a MUST if applications require it.
=> I dislike having a "MUST if". I think MUSTs should be unconditional. This option amounts to 2) below. > 2) For IPv6 nodes, support for DNS SHOULD be included, as many > applications require it. > 3) For IPv6 nodes, DNS SHOULD be included as DNS support is a > 'good thing.' > 4) For IPv6 nodes, DNS MAY be included. => I'm fine with 2,3 or 4. Hesham > > Any suggestions? > > John > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
