So, one of the items that Margaret suggested was some text in the node requirements doc or the scoped addr arch that states that nodes default to being in one site.
However, there has been some mention that people would prefer different behavior in routers. That is, the stated desire was that, by default, each interface on a router be in its own site. This suggestion leads to the model where hosts with multiple interfaces will assume that all its interfaces are in the same site (e.g. have the same site-local zone id) unless explicitly configured to have multiple sites. While routers will default to having a unique site-local zone id for each interface (thus rendering SLs to link-local behavior) unless explicitly configured to have multiple interfaces in the same site. This difference in behavior for hosts and routers leads to some interesting issues. One big one is how the site-local zone ids are setup and potentially changed when a host becomes a router or vice versa. What are others' opinions on this issue? Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
