At 04:33 PM 10/30/02, Richard Draves wrote:
> My take is that the two possible router configs for site locals is
>
> 1. All interfaces are in the same site
> 2. All interfaces are in unique sites
>
> Margaret's proposal that the default behavior is a node's
> interfaces are in 1 site results in case 1. For a router, a
> safer config may be 2. That would strictly limit the outward
> flow of site local addresses.
I like the idea the hosts default to all interfaces in one site, and
routers default to each interface is in a different site.
I have some concerns about this idea, because it means that routers
won't work out-of-the-box in a disconnected, multi-network site that
is only numbered using site-locals...
Also, does it require that all routers will be capable of acting
as SBRs?
Margaret
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
