>> Michel Py wrote: >> Same as the other examples I used before: sensors/control >> devices in a metropolitan water distribution system, or >> in a power grid. SLs are a perfect choice for these,
> Keith Moore wrote: > no they're not. because often the reason you want these > sensors on IP in the first place is so that you don't have > to provide your own infrastructure to talk to them at a > distance. I have to use the same word as Richard did before: crazyness. Keith, what you are saying here is that the utility company is going to have to use PA addresses, that it does not own, to configure tens of thousands of devices on thousands of subnets, and be forced to renumber if they want to switch ISPs, even though these devices have nothing to do with the public Internet, just because you don't like SLs. No, no and no. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
