Perhaps Microsoft has a requirement for multiple, independent address spaces (there's nothing that requires Microsoft == one-site)? Or the Microsoft net is in some way adjacent to another network using SLs?

Adjacent nets that both use SLs is an interesting (potentially problematic?) architecture - I would be interested in finding out about deployment experience with that case.

- Ralph

At 11:11 AM 10/31/2002 -0800, Tony Hain wrote:
itojun wrote:
>       curious: do you run any router which participates to
> multiple sites?

Why would they? It is an address space that they can use for internal
purposes. If they wanted to communicate to an external entity, they
would either have to coordinate use of the SL space, or simply use
globals.

Tony



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to