> Problem is, nobody has bought this yet, because these addresses are PI, > whatever you might call them, and will be misused and leaked to the > defaultless table one day or the other, especially in the lack of a > multihoming solution.
I don't buy it. If the standards say that ISPs in the public Internet are supposed to filter advertisements for global PI addresses, I'm confident they will get filtered in the vast majority of cases. It's not like the situation with v4 where there are varying levels of gray about which prefixes it's reasonable to advertise. We're talking about a clear-cut distinction here, ideally a single (short) prefix that should be black holed. Of course if individual ISPs want to advertise routes to such prefixes internally, perhaps because they're paid to do so, that's their own business. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
