On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 16:29, Keith Moore wrote: > > however I'd be really surprised if SL filtering added to the > cost of a router. >
You're probably right. On the other hand, as per Ole Troan's earlier email (which I agree with), I don't think all router implementations should be required to support multi-sites. As soon as a feature is optional, it can be charged more for, and in my example, following the site-local philosophy, I would have to pay for it. BTW, I'm not sure if you miss-phrased, but we are talking about full multi-site forwarding support (ie zones etc), not just SL filtering. Mark. > Keith > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
