> > > Updating the node requirements and I came to this RFC. > > > This RFC raised a lot > > > of discussion during the Cellular Hosts draft - I wonder > > > what the consensus > > > is for the Node requirements. This could be useful for > > > end-user hosts, > > > => for _stationary_ end hosts. > > Not sure why you say that. RFC 3041 specifically says: >
=> I took out the RFC text to make the mail shorter. When I made that comment I meant to distinguish IPv6 nodes from MNs based on whether they implement MIPv6 MN functions or not. So when I said "stationary" I meant IPv6 nodes that do not implement MN functions as described in MIPv6. For those MNs, we do not yet have a mechanisms to allow for RFC3041 type home addresses. So there would be no point in having them for the CoA since the HoA is always visible for traffic analysis. According to my definition of stationary above, the RFC text is correct of course. Hesham -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
