A BCP that discourages uses of SLs except
in certain narrow cases and explains why is probably more useful than a
BCP that tries to explain exactly when SLs cause problems and when they don't.
Of course, it's quite possible to have both.
I just happen to have a somewhat incomplete document lying around
that I think could be an excellent start for this BCP.
Unfortunately, we're past the -00 draft deadline, so I can't
post it, but I will try to finish it up and post it after Atlanta.
Who would like to help me fill in the missing pieces? I could
particularly use some help documenting the issues that site-locals
cause for:
- Applications
- Security Protocols (and security issues in general)
- Transport Protocols (particularly the voice/session stuff)
- DNS
Keith, can I sign you up to help with applications?
I think I have a good handle on the routing and network management
issues, and some general issues.
Margaret
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
