> What I meant to say that to implement site-locals properly in a router, > the vendor should not be OK to say "we support access-lists, you can use > them to configure site-local borders" or that "we have nice firewall > products, wanna buy one?".
I'm not sure about that. Having routers try to automagically determine site boundaries sounds nice, unless there are cases where it will fail. If the latter is true, then requiring explicit filter configuration seems like the way to go. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
