Hi Tony,
Unnecessary, dubious, & marginal are one perspective. The point is that the recommendation to preclude simultanious use of SL & global is a serious architectural change. It is not a minor edit.
I'm not sure where the concern is coming from that we will make a major change to the addressing architecture during the RFC editing phase. Neither Bob nor I have proposed or advocated that course of action.
You and I may disagree on whether or not this change is warranted, and we may disagree about whether it is a major architectural change or just a usage restriction, but we do agree on one thing... This _would_ be a substantive change to the addressing architecture. So, I would _not_ support making this change without rough WG consensus and proper WG and IESG review, and I'm sure that Bob wouldn't either. I hope that this addresses your concern in that area. Margaret -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
