> I think restricting site-local addresses to sites without ANY external > connection is wrong.
I think expecting applications to cope with a mixture of site-local and global addresses is not only wrong, but unworkable, unless all nodes are also guaranteed to have globals and the site-local addresses can safely be ignored. > It results in excluding many large network with > permanent external connection, that currently have deployed > "site-local-like" addresses and aim at continuing doing so, because of > the "advantages" it provides. no, it just results in those networks having to use slightly different security measures for IPv6 than they used for IPv4. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
