I have no problem with this change, and I think it is editorial rather than substantive.
Brian Richard Draves wrote: > > Folks, > > As you might know draft-ietf-ipv6-default-addr-select-09.txt passed IESG > review and is with the RFC Editor. While reviewing the references we > noticed that the reference to Mobile IPv6 is probably normative, because > the address selection rules refer to home addresses and care-of > addresses. To break this dependency, we plan to add the following > subsection (this is the only change): > > 3.5. Mobility Addresses > > Some nodes may support mobility using the concepts of a home address > and a care-of address (for example see [5]). Conceptually, a home > address is an IP address assigned to a mobile node and used as the > permanent address of the mobile node. A care-of address is an IP > address associated with a mobile node while visiting a foreign link. > When a mobile node is on its home link, it may have an address that > is simultaneously a home address and a care-of address. > > For the purposes of this document, it is sufficient to know whether > or not an address is designated a home address or care-of address. > Whether or not an address should be designated a home address or > care-of address is outside the scope of this document. > > Please speak up if you object to this change. I know some folks object > to other aspects of draft-ietf-ipv6-default-addr-select-09 but for this > discussion thread please restrict your comments to this specific change. > > Thanks, > Rich -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
