>> > conditions where the spec is appropriate
>> > are spelled out enough in RFC3041.
>> Actually, they definitely *aren't* (or rather, they give a wrong
>> impression), see draft-dupont-ipv6-rfc3041harmful-01.txt -- new security
>> considerations / applicability consideration is needed.
>I agree with Pekka.
ok, then (1) we need 3041bis, and (2) node requirement may want to
refer dupont-3041harmful too.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
