> The Host Requirements document is standards track, so I guess the > IPv6 Note Requirements should be standards track.
Not sure the logic works in this case. The HR doc includes changes/updates to individual specs. I.e., it fixes things within various specs that need fixing. In the case of this document, it's not updating any of the the specs. Another factor. What would it mean for the node requirements document to advance on the standards track? What would the interoperability report contain? Info/BCP would seem more appropriate. BCP might be OK and would provide the stronger label. Thomas -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
