Hi Jim, > Today in v6ops I think I heard that compliance to the ND M bit being set > is optional. That I think is wrong. But the node reqs doc states that > dhcpv6 is unconditionally optional which is probably correct because > stateful may not imply dhcpv6 today. But if the M bit is set the host > node (non router) must look for a stateful node. We need to get this > right. > > P.S. John - I will have all my input on this to you in the next few > weeks. But it looks real good. I like the terminology too.
Glad you think that the document looks good. Review it & let me know what you think - especially suggest what text you think is needed for the M bit. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
