On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Christian Huitema wrote:
> > I'm assuming that for the intents and purposes of replacing
> > "local" site-locals, "nearly unique" site-locals would be enough.
> 
> Not quite. 

Depends on what you want.  (Perhaps we should try to formulate these 
better first, but it's more interesting to just pop up some solutions :-).

I believe these will allow for all the cases site-locals were used in 
"limited" cases in the meeting, probably even those in "moderate" on the 
side.

[...]
> unreachable does not mean that they could just as well be ambiguous,
> because these ambiguous addresses end up leaking in various places: DNS
> records, source of ICMP packets, next hop in BGP messages, "received"
> headers in mail or "via" headers in SIP, etc. In short, buggy addresses
> appear at places where they should not. Ambiguity causes problem,
> because you can never debug these problems.

I'm not sure what you mean exactly.  Suppose someone's fec0:1234:5678::1
leaks to the global DNS somehow.  Someone else has fec0:abcd:deff::1
configured in their site.  When you configure your sites prefix length as
e.g.  /48 but still have a null-route (and filters) for fec0::/10, there
should be no problems with connections at all -- they don't work as they 
shouldn't.

> I realize that we have a tension between two requirements, uniqueness
> which imposes some form of registration, and "free use" which imply
> making up the addresses locally and virtually guaranteeing possible
> collisions. Maybe we have to embrace the dilemma, and allow for several
> types of identifiers, some guaranteed unique and some quasi random. 
...
> But
> you must definitely provide unique numbers to those who are ready to
> wait for registration.

Which kind of users would require this kind of complete, guaranteed 
uniqueness?

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to