In your previous mail you wrote: > => the problem of this API is that it is not useful because nobody wants > to change all applications to use it. So we need also a way to change I am not sure why you are saying that all applications needs to change for this.
=> in order to use the API, an application needs to be changed. So with only the API, the only way to influence the Co@/H@ choice is to change all common applications... So the API will get only very limited use and the smart user should still wait for a device to fulfill his needs. they need to use COA for local cases in the visited link. => yes, all the short term not bound to the home applications could like to use a Co@. There are a lot of situations where to get communications killed by movements is not a problem... some existing apps would have to be modified or written for MIPv6 anyway. => we have to keep the number of such applications as low as possible. Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
