Brian Haberman wrote:
> I would like to see text in this document that explicitly states
> that a flow is identified as <SA,DA,FL>.  That is override any
> confusion caused by Appendix A of 2460 that says that a flow is
> <SA,FL>.

So the sentence (below) in the current section 2 ("IPv6 Flow Label Specification") is 
not explicit enough?

"IPv6 nodes forwarding or receiving a labeled IPv6 packet can use
the Flow Label and Source and Destination Address fields to classify
the packet to a certain flow."

        Jarno

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Brian Haberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 11:41 PM
> To: Thomas Narten
> Cc: Brian E Carpenter; Rajahalme Jarno (NRC/Helsinki);
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-flow-label-04.txt
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thomas Narten wrote:
> > We may be more in agreement than appears. I agree that 
> usage scenarios
> > should be left out. What I want to be sure about though is 
> that router
> > implementors have a clear understanding of what they need to
> > implement, in order to be able to support flows once specific usages
> > are defined. (Or, please correct me if this is this not a 
> goal here.)
> > 
> > I.e., folks doing hardware today want to know what they are supposed
> > to do with the Flow Label. They don't want to find themselves later
> > down the road saying "oops" our hardware can't support that 
> because we
> > didn't know that's how flows were defined.
> > 
> > It may well be that all that needs to be said is that a flow is
> > defined by the three tuple, and that implementations need 
> to classify
> > based on the tuple. What is done to packets that belong to a
> > particular flow is future work. But the definition of how the
> > classification is to be done seems important to nail down now. IMO,
> > the current wording about this could be more clear. But if hardware
> > folk feel like the current words are sufficiently clear on this, I'm
> > OK too.
> 

> Brian
> 
> 

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to