On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > Substantial: > > > > This document proposes an approach to allocating IPv6 Site-Local > > address so they are globally unique and routable only inside of a > > site. > > > > ==> it would be good to go a bit more in depth to how this is actually a > > problem. For some it surely isn't; if they don't need to prepare for > > site-mergers, for example. > > Can you define the class of sites that absolutely, definitely, > until the end of time, are guaranteed not to merge?
Well, it depends on quite a bit about which is the usage model for site-locals. For example, home nets probably don't merge if we would mandate that site-locals should not cross home-to-office VPN's. But of course, there can be not absolute guarantee. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
