Dan Lanciani wrote:
...
> Please explain *specifically* what new mechanism v6 supports for providers to
> realize their service differentiation without limiting IP addresses, and show
> why providers will be inclined to make the switch.

Today, ISPs experience a cost advantage when they limit the number of
addresses or provide only dynamic addresses. That cost advantage is 
a result of scarcity, and will therefore not exist in IPv6. If there
is no cost advantage, there can be no differentiation.

We aren't here to provide methods of differentiation; we're here to
ensure a level playing field. But if there is such a factor in IPv6,
it will likely be the cost advantage of route aggregation, undistorted
by the effect of scarcity. Remember that since CIDR arrived, we have
been constantly balancing scarcity against aggregation, and with IPv6
that balancing act largely goes away.

   Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to