On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Jack McCann wrote: > > minor nit: > > NI_NUMERICSCOPE appears in the text (page 24) but not in section 7. > > Thanks for catching that. The reference to NI_NUMERICSCOPE > on page 24 should be removed, it was part of the stuff > that moved to draft-ietf-ipv6-scope-api-00.txt. > > It may be too late to fix this...
Another minor nit: the Introduction says: IPv6 also introduces new features (e.g., traffic class and flowlabel), some of which must be made visible to applications via the API. .. but tclass/flowlabel specification was mostly moved off. I wonder if some rewording would be in order? I believe these kind of editorial nits can be fixed when RFC editor is done and while at AUTH48 state. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
