Pekka Savola wrote:
3.0 IANA Considerations
The following prefix is reserved for use in documentation and MUST
NOT be assigned to any operational IPv6 nodes:
2000:0001::/32
==> I do not understand why this reservation has been made; I see zero technical reason for it -- and it would prevent the use of the full 2000::/16 for something else.
I disagree. Having the reserved prefix is a good think and will hopefully prevent what happen when Sun folks started documenting examples using our address space. Having this prefix defined in a separated document was attempted about 2 years ago (remember Marc Blanchet's document? He was the first one to point out the need for this) and did not go anywhere. As most people will use addresses within 2000::/3, it makes sense to reserve the documentation prefix from that space and this documents seems to me the perfect place to do so. - Alain. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
