>3.0 IANA Considerations
>
> The following prefix is reserved for use in documentation and MUST
> NOT be assigned to any operational IPv6 nodes:
>
> 2000:0001::/32
>
>==> I do not understand why this reservation has been made; I see zero
>technical reason for it -- and it would prevent the use of the full
>2000::/16 for something else.
>
>I'd rather reserve a documentation prefix somewhere else, and in some
>other, _separate_ internet-draft.
there have been multiple attempts made to reserve address space for
documentation, including:
draft-itojun-ipv6-local-experiment-00.txt
draft-itojun-ipv6-local-experiment-01.txt
draft-blanchet-ngtrans-exampleaddr-00.txt
draft-blanchet-ngtrans-exampleaddr-01.txt
i dunno why the attempt is suddenly revisited out of blue. this has
to be discussed in a separate internet draft (i agree with Pekka), on:
- validity of the address reservation itself
- what address should we use?
- for what purpose? (no more private address, please)
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
