I say, ship it. If the RFC number could be consecutive to the one to be assigned to draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-11.txt same as 2373/2374 it would be nice if it does not delay the process.
Although the suppression of the documentation prefix is a worthy trade-off for speed of publication, it does not suppress the need for a documentation prefix RFC IMHO, even if some RIRs have or will allocate one on their own. As many other people, I was not aware of the APNIC prefix, and did like 2000:0001::/32 as it is something that my feeble brain can remember. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
