Bob,
There are some unanswered questions about this APNIC prefix:
1- Can people who are not member of APNIC use this prefix?
2- How do people who are not APNIC members know about this prefix?
i.e. how an implementor familiar with the RFC series but unaware
of APNIC documents will know that such a prefix has been reserved?
3- What about the other RIRs? Are they going to recommend to use
this prefix or are they going to reserve some others?
Perhaps a separate very short Informatinal RFC pointing to
a common RIR policy (once/if established) will help.
- Alain.
Bob Hinden wrote:
Patrick Grossetete just pointed out to me that there is already a
prefix allocated (by APNIC) for documentation. It is:
2001:0DB8::/32
For more details see:
http://www.apnic.org/info/faq/ipv6-documentation-prefix-faq.html#3
Since I don't think we need two, I will remove the one I proposed from
<draft-ietf-ipv6-unicast-aggr-v2-00.txt> and submit a new draft.
Bob
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
