Bob, > Bob Hinden wrote: > [Erik's text] > Any one else have comments on this change?
Works for me. [the 2000::/3 prefix issue] Re-thinking it, my feelings are now that it would be good to remove it from the title, and that indeed it is no different than the TLA/NLA issue; in the same spirit than Erik's text, coining a sentence that says in substance that FP 001 is dead although 2000::/3 still the only range allocated for unicast use seems the way to go. In a sense, we could say that the same way TLAs and NLAs have disappeared to become RIR policy, FP 001 has disappeared to become IANA matter. Proposed title: "IPv6 Global Unicast Address Format" Proposed text: RFC2374 was the definition of addresses for Format Prefix 001 (2000::/3) which is formally made historic by this document. Although as specified in [ARCH] IANA should limit the IPv6 unicast address space to 2000::/3 for now, IANA might allocate unassigned parts of the IPv6 address space to Global Unicast later. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
