Brian, > Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On balance, I prefer ducking the issue in the draft > we are discussing. If I get a /48 I have 16 bits for > subnet addressing and I'm happy, so why worry about > the acronym SLA?
I have not been clear on this but I could not care less about the acronym itself. Killing the acronym is fine, what I think we need to preserve is the concept that there is a boundary there. > (but I still want to see an informational reference to > 3177 to ensure the paper trail is complete). Agree. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
