> Erik Nordmark wrote: > I think the "SLA" field in 2374 has been replaced by the "subnet ID" > field in addr-arch-v3. It probably makes sense to make this clear by > adding a note e.g. > The SLA (subnet local aggregator) field in RFC 2374 remains in > function but with a different name in [ADDR-ARCH]; its new > name is "subnet ID".
I like this. I was looking at some phrasing that would include the word "boundary" or "broder" but I can't formulate anything good. Food for the thought: might be a good idea to include a hint that the "subnet ID" bits are likely part of the scope of the site. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
