This is good. It leaves some more tricky options open for later if we turn out to need tham.
Brian Alain Durand wrote: > > On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 12:47 AM, Michel Py wrote: > > > Alain, > > Your point is valid though, what about this: > > > > Proposed text: > > RFC2374 was the definition of addresses for Format Prefix 001 > > (2000::/3) > > which is formally made historic by this document. Although as specified > > in [ARCH] IANA should limit the IPv6 Global Unicast address space to > > 2000::/3 for now, IANA might later delegate currently unassigned parts > > of the IPv6 address space to the purpose of Global Unicast as well. > > Implementations MUST NOT make address range checks for Global Unicast > > addresses. > > Fine by me. > > - Alain. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
