On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 08:25, Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Alain Durand wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 20, 2003, at 12:03 PM, Ralph Droms wrote:
> > > If it's unclear, then we should edit the document to explicitly
> > > identify the addresses as IPv6 addresses.
> > >
> > > This option is intended to return IPv6 configuration information.
> > > IPv4 addresses for DNS resolvers should be provided through DHCPv4...
>
> I symphatize with this -- there are some uses to have DHCPv6 return IPv4
> addresses too -- but the result would just make the dnsconfig option more
> complex for little benefit. Let's face it: if you deploy DHCPv6, you
> really should have long since deployed IPv6-enabled nameservers too.
>
> So, I think clarifying the scope to do only IPv6 seems like the best
> option by far.
Is that necessary? IPv4 addresses can be returned in IPv4 Mapped format
if necessary. Just add some text explaining this. With our hybrid
IPv4/IPv6 stack implementation this would work out of the box.
MikaL
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
